Thursday, December 10, 2009

Roger Federer Relocates to...Positively 4th Street by JA Allen


Roger Federer, our sublime tennis hero reborn, adorned in a shimmering blue sweater, eyes glistening, bathed in amber sunlight, crown intact, moves serenely into a bank of microphones surrounded by an always aggressive media corps…

You won the prize, Roger. Your world has been righted…your critics subdued. They are all singing your praises now that you have won your fifth straight US Open crown. You are master of your domain.

The yo-yo press is taking its lumps in style. Even petulant old desk jockeys parrot a new refrain, anointing Roger King for a Day. Massive back-pedaling progresses. In the midst of all of this melodramatic crow eating, however, an uncertainty surfaces.

Somehow, the accolades are less ebullient and the victory hangover less pervasive than in 2007, when the entire press corps agreed that excluding red clay, our boy was golden, perfect and practically unbeatable. Roger believed it, too. As did we all.

It is understandable. As a society, we are harsh —even fickle. We worship youth and beauty enhanced by sustained mental, physical and spiritual excellence. We cannot forgive or accept imperfections in our heroes, especially the press—aka, the forecasters of the fatal flaw.

Confined unwittingly to a bell jar, the sports wing of the fourth estate awaits the fall, the disintegration, and another catastrophic collapse. The end product is the ultimate break-through story. As streaks unfold, the press predicts and analyzes not only what happened but more profoundly what will happen tonight, tomorrow or at the end of the season.

All the while, on-air commentators hope for a final break, a release allowing a breath of fresh air into a predictable but often stale world order. The press needs change, shifting focus and new personalities in order to breathe life into their words and their interpretation of events. Otherwise, they remain trapped in their vacuum and cease to be relevant.

The reversed stance on the Mighty Federer’s career after the 2008 US Open victory represents a reprieve and not an absolution. Roger understands this now.

In 2008, he fell to earth. Federer’s escalation to the top of men’s tennis resulted in a prolonged flight too close to perfection. While there, he soared above his competition with a display of tennis acumen that left his competition seemingly flat-footed and chained to the ground.

Reporters exhausted an extensive reserve of superlatives in describing the game of Roger Federer for 4½ years.

As his wings began to melt in January of 2008, Roger could no longer sustain his ethereal level of play. His downward trajectory, however, allowed him a different perspective. As he tumbled toward earth, he learned about existing within the reality of his sport.

All the hours he spent courting the media jesters, reacting to their deadlines, their pleas for more substance, to add more grist for the media mill—were rewarded in 2008 by diatribes about Roger’s ineffective footwork, his age, his inability to summon his best, his dearth of effort, will and his mental and physical exhaustion. They were already anointing another No. 1 before he hit the ground and bounced down to No. 2.

The relationships he felt he had cultivated in the sports world had evaporated. The respect Roger felt he deserved was denied. His disappointment and disillusionment were palpable in his demeanor and through his remarks. Inevitably, the next loss Roger Federer suffers will bring a return of the negative back hand of the press.

Even though Roger feels he lost the media war, he won thousands of new fans. He regained his form and is on the verge of soaring again, perhaps not quite as high or for quite so long.

The stratosphere is a bit more crowded these days. Competition is intense. But Federer is back and the tennis world is more complete for his ascension. There will, however, never be another tennis athlete to fly so long and so close to the sun…

Wiser and better equipped to deal with his demons, our splendid hero now perches high on a balcony overlooking the courtyard being celebrated by thousands of onlookers. Ready to compete in the Davis Cup, our handsome Swiss hero smiles and waves to his grateful fans.

Finally he turns back to the press smiling, strumming slowly, recalling the lyrics of an old rock classic penned by the acidic troubadour Bob Dylan…you’ve gotta lotta nerve…

Friday, December 4, 2009

Confessions of a Tennis Junkie by JA Allen


September 1, 2008

Jerry Lewis made only one significant film—The King of Comedy—also starring Robert De Niro. There is no doubt that the quality of Lewis’ performance is aided in no small measure by Martin Scorsese’s direction.

On the surface, the film explores the uneasy relationship between a star and his “fans.” It is a quirky, edgy film—leaving onlookers feeling just a little uncomfortable, a little claustrophobic as De Niro and Sandra Bernhard harass Jerry, a famous talk show host, by following him around, invading his office, showing up at his house and eventually kidnapping him.

That is basically how I feel about my own addiction. I am a tennis junkie.

You may find me at all hours watching grainy, often jerky live-streaming matches on my laptop or worse yet, sitting with my chin in my hands watching scores blink on a “live score” site just so I can try to keep up with a worldwide sport largely ignored in the United States.

The truth of the matter is that I secretly suffer from TOPD—Tennis Obsessive Personality Disorder.

Throughout the years I have been obsessed with particular players, starting with the body-beautiful Bjorn Borg. Currently I am embroiled in my Roger Federer phase and I have been ever since chiseled Federer defeated Sampras at Wimbledon in 2001.

Being a “fan” of someone I do not know and will never know—following every move, word and gesture—strikes me as intrusive and unnatural. When Roger loses, I feel like someone close to me died. I suffer.

This puts me on par with the crazed characters in Scorsese’s film. Yet, I am not a fool—I know my behavior is excessive and I feel guilty about it. I long to be objective.

Here is the cruel irony of being an obsessed tennis fan—being the fan of an actor allows for decades of adulation. Even fans of teams can cheer on year after year, regardless of who populates the roster.

But to reach the top in tennis is an incredible feat. To stay at the top is an even greater accomplishment. Impossibly, once on top, the fan needs the reign to go on forever. It becomes, then, not Roger Federer’s Quest for Perfection, but our expectation of it.
Moreover, it is the media’s insatiable need to report, to stay on top, to be relevant that spurs on the constant demand for victory on a perfect note.

First, we nag Roger to win a Major—then a Slam. When he does that, we insist that he win two—then three—every year!

When he wins three—we chide him for not winning the French—just as we did Borg, who never won the U.S. Open; or Sampras, who also never won the French; or Wilander, who never won Wimbledon.

Agassi won on all surfaces and an Olympic gold medal, but he didn’t win enough. We are never satisfied as fans. We are spoon-fed our natural dissatisfaction through the media who articulate shortcomings as if their livelihood depended on it! We expect our sports heroes to obtain the perfection we lack in our own lives.

Throughout the years, I have come to understand that a “fan” like me invests heavily in the life of the star athlete. We who lead lives of quiet desperation, associating our own well-being through the success of our heroes.

No one applauds my sacrifices or successes. No one follows me around and bombards me with questions. The public remains blankly unaware of me. That is not to say that what I do for a living is less important, but it is easier to accomplish.

There are thousands capable of doing what I do—but only one or two who stand at the pinnacle of tennis. As my roles in life diminish and my persona fades, I rely on tennis to fill the voids left by age, divorce, solitude, and lack of talent.

I think what Scorsese was getting at in his film was perspective—from whose point of view is the truth revealed?

Comments:
Long John Silver posted about 1 year ago
once again - you have impressed me to no bounds, 2/2 your second article and am POTD ing again

why - because its nakedly true

the desire to not really worship - but understand someone in both victory and defeat is what that separates from a true junkie to a casual observer, you can see and observe what others cant

beautiful - am working on a similar piece ... you beat me to it, hence that will wait

wonderful JA - I like your take on the game, not just reporting, but you go behind the theory and the psychology of the game and the fans -

cheers - keep writing yeah ...

L.J. Burgess posted about 1 year ago
Stunning work. Stunning.

I've often felt that my complete detachment from wordly 'heros' was a psychological issue.

What a relief.



Fabulous Federer's Future Dancin' Feat


By JA Allen August 28, 2008

Dear Rog baby,

Been away. So sorry to hear your tennis career’s in the toilet! Who woulda believed it, man? How do you go from being feted filet mignon to dawg fodder in a few short months?

I hear both Big Mac’s calling it a day on your tennis career. There’s a load of American ground round temporizing Swiss prime! Every pen and shout man from here to Australia is busy composing eulogies.

There’s gotta be some sort of contest because no matter where you turn, black crepe is clogging the air waves—all with a tainted touch of deepest regrets and much tsking and lecturing about coaching, scheduling and motivation. It’s a monolith out here, man!

They say the US Open is your big swan song before they put you out to pasture...you and Big Brown. Bummer—but it is better nuzzlin’ fillies out in the hinterland than being put down literally—right, big guy?! Whoa Momma!

So who set fire to your invincibility cloak and nuked your Nikes? Did he who shall remain nameless invoke a Spanish curse? Btw, rumor was you and big Stan won a “gold medal” in Beijing. Right!! And I’m Sandra Dee!

No Shanghai sayonara for the Fed man this year? Understand you crashed and burned at Wimby and the French. Hope you at least reached the second round. Every franc helps! Tell me have you won a match this year? Holy horror stories, Swiss guy! Where’s the beat mobile when you need it?! And who was the Joker that beat you at the Aussie Open??

So what are you ranked now? 50? 100? God, I hope not lower than 100! What a year—surreal spiral…again, condolences on the end of a glorious career…but one door closes and another one opens, right big guy?!

Rog, I know you’ve got a couple of bucks stashed away so there is no need to panic. I just gotta tell ya, please, please—no matter how much dough they throw at you—do not agree to do Dancing with the Stars without letting me run interference! I know you can trip the light fantastic on the courts.

But, can you rumba, waltz or do the Paso Doble in skin-tight toreador pants and no shirt? Or how about a cha-cha or a quick step looking oh so hot with a glint in your eye as some gorgeous lithe dancer winds herself around you, ripping off your shirt and sliding down your thighs. Personally, I think you can do it, Rog, with my help.

Now, admit it—what sounds like more fun? Slogging your way back into tennis' top 10 or dancin’ neath the silver moon with one hand wavin’ free….I can see you already on another strobe lit path to fame and glory…show biz calls!

Comments:
Long John Silver posted about 1 year ago
WELCOME - Welcome to the tennis house

am LJS - and wanted to drop in to say hi

this came right out of the left field - very innovative .... unique and hence super interesting

liked it -

looking forward - definitely, to read more from you

cheers ....

J.A. Allen posted about 1 year ago
Thanks - hoped not too far left field. Big fan of your writing! New experience for me but love tennis. Again, nice to be acknowledged by the super stars...jaa

Long John Silver posted about 1 year ago
oh ... no

not a super star or anything like that - just a simple bloke who loves the game

would love to someone to write more about tennis .... join in (really)

Dan Noon posted about 1 year ago
are you sick in the head. mr. federer's career is not over. hes just talkin a break....his best is yet to come....

Brandon Evans posted about 1 year ago
Who said he's career is over?

Roger Federer: Ascending the Matterhorn


By JA Allen August 23, 2008

Like Marat Safin, who temporarily left the ATP tour in 2007 to climb Cho-Oyu on the Tibet-Nepal border, Roger Federer began 2008 at the foot of a mountain of expectation.

2008 was to be the pinnacle of his career, the piece de resistance…afterwards he could begin a quiet descent while still enjoying illustrious fame having conceivably conquered Roland Garros and Olympic Gold.

This would mean a career grand slam and perhaps a calendar year Golden Slam. All of these feats were within his grasp and certainly within the scope of his immense talent. Even so, he must have sensed that his reach was too far. Yet, what was he to remove from his plate?

For Roger, as always, anything was possible. He needed only three more Grand Slams to surpass Sampras. He needed only another 78 weeks at No. 1 to equal Sampras’ total, and he needed to end 2008 and 2009 at No. 1 to equal another Sampras record.

If he could defeat Nadal just once at Roland Garros, he could win the only Grand Slam to elude him. It was the perfect scenario for tennis’ golden boy…as if the stars were aligning just for him.

2008, however, has not proven golden for Roger. It began with food poisoning and a mysterious illness that left him weak and tired. He was later diagnosed with mononucleosis. The effect of the illness diminished his reaction time and his ability to recover energy.

He cannot bounce back as quickly as he could. He lost in the semi-finals of the Australian Open to Djokovic. The world sat up straight. Roger Federer lost in a Grand Slam not on clay.

Some on his team advised Roger to take time off and recover fully. He decided to “play through it.” In other words, he felt he could continue to play well enough to maintain his ranking and resume his edge once the effects of the illness dissipated.

It was risky. But even Roger could not have predicted the vehemence of the media characterizing this momentary lapse as a career crisis of monumental proportions—he had created a monster, and it was on his back as he tried to climb to the summit.

Losses at Dubai, Indian Wells and Miami only added to the media frenzy. Losing to players like Fish and Roddick—players he routinely defeated—began to play on his mind, eroding his confidence. The load was growing heavier by the moment. The weight of all this expectation loomed large.

The clay season that found Roger returning to form for the most part ended in a disastrous final with Nadal at the 2008 French Open, where Roger was embarrassed by the scope of his defeat.

The Wimbledon final broke his heart and what was left of his indomitable spirit. This was his chance to sit alone ahead of Borg with six consecutive Wimbledon championships. He fought back brilliantly to regain his pride, but he lost the match.

The hard court season has so far been unkind. The rhythm is off—so goes the serve…and the forehand. While Roger has shown moments of brilliance—it only takes one “off” match to be out of the tournament. So went Simon, Karlovic and Blake.

Now comes the U.S. Open and Federer is tired. One wonders what would have happened if he had taken off those months after the Australian Open when the diagnosis was confirmed?

While we are considering this option, let us not overlook the fact that even a step off Roger Federer was in the finals of the French Open and Wimbledon where he played in what some call the greatest final ever.

He also was a semifinalist in Australia, where he lost to the eventual champion, Djokovic. He won an Olympic Gold medal in tennis doubles.

Regardless of whether Roger wins the U.S. Open, 2008 has not been a good year when you consider the expectations going in—that it has been a disappointment for Federer fans is putting it kindly.

2009, however, offers promise and relief. After rest and a chance to practice and work with a new coach—after revising a schedule that nearly killed him, Roger Federer will be back, winning again. He will try to wipe 2008 off the books.

There are still new heights to scale and peaks and valleys to endure. He needs that, and tennis needs that, because Roger Federer will always be in the conversation of who is the greatest tennis player of all time.

Comments:
Andrew McNair posted about 1 year ago
Great article mate. 5 stars

Roger Federer - Virtually Unequalled


by JA Allen August 22, 2008

I have spent the last few months in Roger’s house, wandering from thread to thread, hoping to understand the mania surrounding the seemingly depleted tennis maestro in his virtual multiplex arena.

I am of course referring to the Official Website of Roger Federer @ http://www.rogerfederer.com. There abide +188,000 members of all ages from all over the world with normally less than five hundred at a time messaging online.

Intentionally anonymous they write to Roger and each other about Roger Federer, tennis, tournaments, other players and anything else they choose. It is a well-established community.

Most members are women reveling in Roger’s hair, his eyes, his lips, his body, his attire, his energy level, and his amazing smile. The conversational tone turns frenetic when discussing, dressing and undressing Roger (their adult paper doll) for the next tournament.

Frankly at times there is enough sexual energy here to launch the next space shuttle. Sometimes a quick run through the sprinkler may be required. The ladies of Roger’s house tolerate Mirka [Roger’s girlfriend] because she appears motherly toward Roger. They regard her kindness as endearing accepting her – reluctantly.

It is, however, far more than sexual attraction – these ladies adore Federer. It is akin to hero worship. He is everyman they ever wanted—kind, accomplished, warm, childlike, innocent, brave, handsome, powerful, poised, athletic, artistic – beautiful in mind, spirit and body.

Superlatives never end for all of Roger’s supporters. Within these walls they accept nothing but complete submission. No other player is allowed in Roger’s house. The Bat Man Spaniard (Nadal) and the Joker (Djokovic) are taboo—almost forbidden topics.

Members are passionate about tennis, knowledgeable and sophisticated in their analysis of most players…even though members may lash out at Nadal and Djokovic often in pure frustration. No criticism of Federer is permitted. Some analysts have become persona non-gratis like Brad Gilbert (ESPN) and John McEnroe who continue to bury Federer and not to praise him.

In order to fairly judge the competition, entering Rafael Nadal’s Website you will find approximately 25,000 members with less than 50 people actively online…not even close…yet.

Soon there will be +200,000 occupying Roger’s House – all united by this Swiss legend. He is universally loved not just for his extraordinary abilities at playing tennis – but because he is a consummate diplomat speaking for all his fellow players, representing his sport in the world-wide community and providing an example of sportsmanship and excellent behavior all find exemplary.

What is there not to love about this man? The real test comes now when he is no longer on top. Having fallen to #2---is it easier to be “nice” when the world is your oyster then when it becomes your burden?

Only Roger can answer that question. For his fans sequestered inside his online Swiss chalet Roger’s ascension to the top is not “if” but “when.” Those who doubt are banished. As their numbers swell, you have to wonder how could so many be wrong?